Election Expert Hub
GW Law's guide to the 2024 election cycle
GW Law’s Election Expert Hub is your go-to source for insightful analysis and expert perspectives on the 2024 Presidential Election. GW Law’s Deans and Professors will provide comprehensive coverage and in-depth insights into the legal ramifications shaping the upcoming election. Stay tuned for commentary, exclusive interviews, and updates as our experts decode the policies on the ballot.
For media inquiries, please reach out to Shannon Mitchell our Media Relations Specialist at [email protected].
Interested in additional 2024 Election information? See what's happening around George Washington University by visiting the GDub Election Hub website.
Trending Hits
Top media hits from our election experts in the news.
Ballot Breakdown
Faculty members provide insightful analysis on election topics.
Current Topics
Our faculty address pressing concerns in this election cycle.
Scholarly Work
Published work by our faculty members.
Our Experts
GW Law has leading faculty members available across a wide range of law and political topics. Discover the expertise of our election experts and their topics.
Trending in 2024
Why SCOTUS Justices split over whether Congress should’ve been brought into the Colorado ruling
Professor Jeffrey Rosen discusses the Supreme Court's split decision about Trump on the ballot.
Texas abortion ban harms healthcare even for those who want to be pregnant
Sonia Suter was quoted by OpenDemocracy.
How a Trump re-election could favor Elon Musk in his fights with U.S. regulators
Professor Richard Pierce discusses Elon Musk's ongoing battles with regulators and what that might mean in a Trump administration.
Breaking Down the Ballot
Voting Rights: Election Denialism with Spencer Overton
Discussing threats to US elections and solutions to improve voter access.
Artificial Intelligence: H.R. 3106 with Dr. Mary Anne Franks
Dr. Franks discusses the importance of the Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act.
Current Topics in the Election
Media outlets often reach out to our distinguished faculty members seeking their perspectives on a wide range of topics including AI, healthcare, voting rights, climate change, and much more. To gain valuable insights into the upcoming 2024 election, leverage the extensive expertise of GW Law's faculty for in-depth examination and interpretation.
Artificial Intelligence
A.I. May Not Get a Chance to Kill Us if This Kills It First
There’s an existential threat to the technology working its way through the courts. Robert Brauneis is quoted in Slate.
Additional News
Mary Anne Franks
Robert Brauneis
AI Firms Under Fire for Allegedly Infringing on Copyrights., Voice of America
Aram Gavoor
Biden executive order on artificial intelligence faces enforcement obstacles, Washington Examiner
Spencer Overton
Amid growing concern, lawmakers punt AI deepfake bills to next session, Loudoun Times-Mirror
Climate Change
Supreme Court water ruling could transform NEPA, ESA
Glicksman highlights the harm it would cause the EPA and ESA if the Supreme Court were to remove Section 404 statures.
Additional News
Robert Glicksman
Emissions Rules' Foes May Be Forced To Yield To Automakers, Law360
Randall Abate
Emily Hammond
Healthcare
The 150-Year-Old Comstock Act Could Transform the Abortion Debate
Sonia Suter is quoted in the Smithsonian Magazine in the centuries-old debate about abortion and its new advancements, including mail-order mifeprsitone aquirments.
Additional News
Sonia Suter
Dayna Bowen Matthew
Alan Morrison
Immigration
GW’s Cori Alonso-Yoder: The Greatest Immigration Issue at Hand for the 2024 Election
In this interview, Cori Alonso-Yoder discusses how the greatest immigration issue being debated is the regulation of the Southwest border.
Additional News
Cori Alonso-Yoder
Alberto Benítez
Voting Rights
Vivek Ramaswamy wants young voters to pass a civics test. These Americans call it a flashback to the 1960s.
Spencer Overton explains the installment of the 26th amendment, which grants almost every American 18 and up the right to vote.
Additional News
Spencer Overton
Voting rights advocates welcomed a Supreme Court win. But the fight isn't over, National Public Radio (NPR)
Jeremy Bearer-Friend
Race-Based Poll Taxes And 20th-Century Discrimination, Forbes
Scholarly Work
At GW Law, the excellence of our faculty's scholarly work stands as a testament to their expertise and dedication. Their groundbreaking research not only shapes legal discourse but also exerts a profound influence on the world, contributing invaluable insights that impact legal practice, policymaking, and societal advancements.
Artificial Intelligence Accountability of Public Administration
Professor Francesca Bignami explores the difficulty with machine learning for the law in her article "Artificial Intelligence Accountability of Public Administration" published in the American Journal of Comparative Law.
View scholarly work from our faculty members on Climate Change.
Protecting the Public Health with the Inflation Reduction Act — Provisions Affecting Climate Change and Its Health Effects
Professor Robert Glicksman discusses the Inflation Reduction Act's role in mitigating climate change’s well-established adverse health effects.
Colorblind Tax Enforcement
In this article, Professor Jeremy Bearer-Friend refutes the IRS' position that racial bias cannot occur under current IRS practices.
Reproductive Technologies and the Law
Reproductive Technologies and the Law co-authored by Professor Sonia Suter is designed to introduce our students to the essentials in science, medicine, law, and ethics that underpin and shape each of the topics that combine to form the law of reproductive technologies.
Eliminating the Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine in Immigration Matters
Professor Tania Valdez discusses the shift of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine from criminal to immigration cases, highlighting courts' oversight limitations.
The Insidious Effect of Soundbites: Why Fences Aren’t Punishment
Professor Theresa Gabaldon discusses the “soundbite approach” in her article "The Insidious Effect of Soundbites: Why Fences Aren’t Punishment" published in the @AmULRev.
Public Safety and the Right to Bear Arms
Professor Robert Cottrol recontextualizes the Second Amendment debate by examining the two main interpretations of militia clause of the amendment.
Provisional Assumptions
Professor Heidi Liu introduces an original tool: a provisional assumption. A provisional assumption would ask jurors not to ignore information but to assume certain information about subjects for which evidence is inadmissible; for instance, to assume that a civil defendant has no insurance against liability or that a criminal defendant has no prior criminal record.
How Should the Supreme Court Respond to the Combination of Political Polarity, Legislative Impotence, and Executive Branch Overreach?
Professor Richard Pierce discusses two related problems that the Supreme Court must address: the large increase in nationwide preliminary injunctions issued by district judges to prohibit the executive branch from implementing major federal actions; and the large increase in the number of cases in which the Supreme Court either stays or refuses to stay preliminary injunctions without providing an adequate explanation for its action.
Between a Rock and a Hard Place?* ICT Companies, Armed Conflict, and International Law
Professor Arturo Carrillo explores what an information, communication and technology company is to do when operating in the midst of an international armed conflict.
When the Math Matters: Improving Statistical Advocacy in Gerrymandering Litigation
Professor Robin Juni discusses Gill v. Whitford, a gerrymandering dispute involving an important mathematical idea—the core statistical concept of regression analysis in her article published in the @NebLRev.