Celorio, Rosa

GW Law Faculty Publications

January 2, 2022

SSRN | Scholarly Commons


(With Hurst Hannum, S. James Anaya & Dinah L. Shelton.) International Human Rights: Problems of Law, Policy, and Practice (7th ed., Aspen Publishing, 2023)
      Sixth edition published in 2018.

Women and International Human Rights in Modern Times: A Contemporary Casebook (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022).


The Kaleidoscope of Climate Change and Human Rights: The Promise of International Litigation for Women, Indigenous Peoples, and Children, 13 Ariz. J. Env’t L. & Pol’y 155 (2023).

Legal & H.R. Centre and Centre for Reproductive Rights (on behalf of Tanzanian girls) v. Tanz. (Afr. Committee of Experts on the RTS & Welfare of the Child (ACERWC)), I.L.M. First View (2023).

Several Steps Forward, One Backward: Climate Change, Latin America, and Human Rights Resilience, 34 Md. J. Int'l L. 96 (2019).
     Reprinted as: Several Steps Forward, One Backward: Climate Change, Latin America, and Human Rights Resilience, in 1 Comparative Environmental Law and Regulations § 2C (Lye Lin-Heng, Elizabeth Burleson, Kirk W. Junker & Nicholas A. Robinson eds., Thomson Reuters, 2021).

Introductory Note to José Isabel Salas Galindo and Others: United States (Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R.), 58 Int’l Legal Materials 738 (2019).

Discrimination and the Regional Human Rights Protection Systems:  The Enigma of Effectiveness, 40 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 781 (2019).

Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle: Insights on the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine, Double Jeopardy, and the Status of Puerto Rico, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. On the Docket (June 22, 2016), https://www.gwlr.org/puerto-rico-v-sanchez-valle-insights-on-the-dual-sovereignty-doctrine-double-jeopardy-and-the-status-of-puerto-rico/.

The Case of Karen Atala and Daughters: Toward a Better Understanding of Discrimination, Equality, and the Rights of Women, 15 CUNY L. Rev. 335-389 (2012).

The Rights of Women in the Inter-American System of Human Rights: Current Opportunities and Challenges in Standard-Setting, 65 U. Miami L. Rev. 819-847 (2011).

Introductory Note to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case of Gonzalez (Cotton Field) v. Mexico, 49 Int’l Legal Materials 637-639 (2010).

Introductory Note to the European Court of Human Rights: Opuz v. Turkey, 48 Int’l Legal Materials 907-908 (2009).


Autonomía, Mujeres y Derechos: Tendencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Revista Electrónica Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales A. L. Gioja (June – Nov. 2018), at 1.

Derechos, Libertad, Autonomía y Matrimonio. El legado Constitucional e Internacional de Obergefell vs. Hodges, in La constitucionalización del derecho de familia Perspectivas comparadas (N. E. Yaksic, A. M. Ibarra Olguín eds. 2018).


Having Strong Gender Violence Laws Isn’t Enough, Am. Q. (Oct. 21, 2020), https://americasquarterly.org/article/having-strong-gender-violence-laws-isnt-enough/.

The Need for Human Rights in Times of Crisis, Oxford Human Rights Hub (June 12, 2020), http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/the-need-for-human-rights-in-times-of-crisis/.

A Glimpse of Hope from the U.S. Supreme Court: Bostock v. Clayton County, RightsViews (June 30, 2020), http://blogs.cuit.columbia.edu/rightsviews/2020/06/30/a-glimpse-of-hope-from-the-u-s-supreme-court-bostock-v-clayton-county/.