GW Law Students Win Moot Court Competitions
Two teams of GW Law students won at moot court competitions earlier this year.
The Bernard Center for Law and Technology provides education, events, scholarship, and dialogue about intellectual property, privacy, data security, and technology law. Internally, the Center is divided into two important areas of academic areas within GW Law School:
GW Law proudly unveils its Center for Law and Technology, focusing on Intellectual Property and Privacy and Technology Law.
GW Law recently added a new JD Concentration in Privacy, Data Security and Technology (PDT) Law.
GW JOLT will present articles, essays, and student notes on law and technology issues including, intellectual property, privacy, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, digital health, online social media, behavioral advertising, and other existing and emerging areas of technology related law.
Download the GW Bernard Center for Law & Technology Brochure (PDF)
Scholarships and competitions are available for both programs.
Learn more about this once-in-a-lifetime study abroad opportunity.
Center Faculty Co-Director; Co-Director, Intellectual Property Law Program
rbraunlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (rbraun[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Faculty Co-Director; Bernard Professor of Intellectual Property and Technology Law
dsolovelaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (dsolove[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Director; Associate Dean, Intellectual Property Law
jwhealanlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (jwhealan[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Deputy Director; Bernard Assistant Dean, Privacy and Technology Law
adrienne [dot] fowlerlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (adrienne[dot]fowler[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
GW Law Students Win Moot Court Competitions
Two teams of GW Law students won at moot court competitions earlier this year.
GW Law Professors Win Awards for Papers on Privacy
GW Law professors Alicia Solow-Niederman and Daniel Solove are among the six winners of the Future of Privacy Forum's Privacy Papers for Policymakers Awards.
"Tempe weighs changing rules for holding events, raising 1st Amendment concerns"
The Arizona Republic quoted Mary Anne Franks explaining, "First Amendment doctrine typically opposes pre-approval requirements to engage in expressive activity.”
"Can We See Our Future in China’s Cameras?"
The New York Times quoted Daniel Solove saying there’s no transparency, accountability, or limitations on DOGE’s access to American’s personal data and information.
"As Deepfake Bans Take Effect, Child Offenders Remain a Stumbling Block"
Tech Policy Press quoted Mary Anne Franks recommendation of criminal penalties for Deepfakes, but there needs to be more policy solutions for youth offenders.
Please fill out our contact form to get in touch with the Center.