Professors Weigh In on Final Cases of the Supreme Court Term

GW Law faculty members shared their expertise in the media.

July 6, 2016

Alt Text
The Supreme Court justices have retired for the summer. They released major decisions before the term ended, a few of which affected firearm possession, public corruption, abortion, and the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. Several members of the GW Law faculty actively tracked these cases as they developed and shared their expert opinions with the media.
 

Voisine v. United States


The Court held that misdemeanor assault convictions for reckless conduct trigger a federal statutory firearms ban.

June 28, 2016 – Bloomberg Radio
 
June 27, 2016 - The Washington Post 
 

McDonnell v. United States


The Court provided a more limited interpretation of the term "official act" as it relates to the federal bribery statute.

Jessica Tillipman 

June 27, 2016 - The Washington Post
 
June 27, 2016 - The Washington Post
 

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt


The Court concluded that two Texas laws did not offer medical benefits sufficient to justify the burdens upon access to abortions that they imposed.

Naomi R. Cahn

June 27, 2016 - Hearst TV
 

Jonathan Turley

June 27, 2016 - CNN
 

Utah v. Strieff 


The Court held that evidence seized as part of a search incident to arrest was admissible because discovery of an arrest warrant attenuated the connection between an unlawful stop and the evidence seized. 

Orin S. Kerr

June 21, 2016 - "The Volokh Conspiracy"
 
June 20, 2016 - "SCOTUSblog"