Professor Laura A. Dickinson published a report on the U.S. military commissions at Guantanamo Bay following a workshop at GW Law that brought together experts to discuss pressing legal and policy issues surrounding the U.S. naval base.
Professor Emily Hammond analyzed the oral argument in the Supreme Court case Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren on SCOTUSblog. Concerning mining of the largest uranium deposit in the country, the case tests the issue of legislative motive to determine if a state statute is pre-empted by federal law.
"Yesterday's midterm elections sparked a record voter turnout across the country. How can we harness that energy going forward?"
Professor Jonathan R. Siegel filed an amicus brief that helped result in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing and remanding a judgment of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Beberman v. United States. "It was gratifying to be able to help a real plaintiff overcome an artificial and unjust barrier," he said.
November 1, 2018
Susan R. Jones, Professor of Clinical Law, has been elected to the American Law Institute, the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and improve the law.
October 24, 2018
Thomas Buergenthal, Lobingier Professor Emeritus of Comparative Law and Jurisprudence, who served on the International Court of Justice, is one of three jurists who have concluded that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un should be tried for crimes against humanity for the way his regime uses brutal political prisons to control the population according to a new report released by the International Bar Association War Crimes Committee.
December 12, 2017
Dmitry Karshtedt, Associate Professor of Law, participated in a debate at the 18th Annual Berkeley-Stanford Advanced Patent Law Institute. The debate, "Is the PTAB Constitutional?" focused on the question presented in the Supreme Court case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC. The issue is whether inter partes review, an adversarial process used by the USPTO/Patent Trial and Appeal Board to analyze the validity of existing patents, violates the Constitution by extinguishing issued patents through a non-Article III forum.
January 17, 2018
Jasmine Smith Slider
"It's particularly helpful to have such accomplished female professors. I felt they understood that in a profession historically dominated by men, mine would be a different journey." - Jasmine Smith,
Nicolas Sabet Slider
"The professors of GW in NY teach us about whatever they did that day. This real-world experience in the business field, for an entire semester—GW is the only law school offering that." - Nicolas Sabet, JD '18
Laila Ghauri Slider
"I've met the movers and shakers at GW, including numerous players shifting the paradigm in Silicon Valley. They've been so down-to-earth and have offered me rare industry insights and career advice. I'm very lucky to be at law school here." - Laila Ghauri, JD '18
Meredith Lapp Slider
"One summer, I worked with another law student from the Midwest who had to cram the great experience of working in D.C. into a few weeks. But because I'm here in D.C., I could continue working at my externship during the school year. This lead to a job offer." - Meredith Lapp, JD '18