Religious Questions and Saving Constructions


February 19, 2014

Ira Lupu, F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Research Professor Emeritus of Law, and Robert Tuttle, David R. and Sherry Kirschner Berz Research Professor of Law and Religion, authored a post together about the Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby case for the U.S. Supreme Court news site SCOTUSblog. Professors Lupu and Tuttle address "two opposing undercurrents" of the case: the prohibition of courts resolving questions of religious doctrine and the "constitutionally prudent" strategy of interpreting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to limit employer-imposed harm on employees.

Read more at:
Read More