Two Faculty Members Quoted During Senate Testimony
Professors Alicia Solow-Niederman and Daniel Solove’s research was quoted during a Senate testimony on the need for privacy laws in the age of AI.
The Bernard Center provides education, events, scholarship, and dialogue about intellectual property, privacy, data security, and technology law. Internally, the Bernard Center is divided into two important areas of academic areas within GW Law:
GW Law proudly unveils its Center for Law and Technology, focusing on Intellectual Property and Privacy and Technology Law.
GW Law recently added a new JD Concentration in Privacy, Data Security and Technology (PDT) Law.
GW JOLT will present articles, essays, and student notes on law and technology issues including, intellectual property, privacy, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, digital health, online social media, behavioral advertising, and other existing and emerging areas of technology related law.
Download the Bernard Center Brochure (PDF)
Scholarships and competitions are available for both programs.
Learn more about this once-in-a-lifetime study abroad opportunity.
Center Faculty Co-Director; Co-Director, Intellectual Property Law Program
rbraunlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (rbraun[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Faculty Co-Director; Bernard Professor of Intellectual Property and Technology Law
dsolovelaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (dsolove[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Director; Associate Dean, Intellectual Property Law
jwhealanlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (jwhealan[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Center Deputy Director; Bernard Assistant Dean, Privacy and Technology Law
adrienne [dot] fowlerlaw [dot] gwu [dot] edu (adrienne[dot]fowler[at]law[dot]gwu[dot]edu)
Two Faculty Members Quoted During Senate Testimony
Professors Alicia Solow-Niederman and Daniel Solove’s research was quoted during a Senate testimony on the need for privacy laws in the age of AI.
“20 Talks” is a series of insightful discussions with experts and influential personalities across diverse domains.
"Tempe weighs changing rules for holding events, raising 1st Amendment concerns"
The Arizona Republic quoted Mary Anne Franks explaining, "First Amendment doctrine typically opposes pre-approval requirements to engage in expressive activity.”
"Can We See Our Future in China’s Cameras?"
The New York Times quoted Daniel Solove saying there’s no transparency, accountability, or limitations on DOGE’s access to American’s personal data and information.
"As Deepfake Bans Take Effect, Child Offenders Remain a Stumbling Block"
Tech Policy Press quoted Mary Anne Franks recommendation of criminal penalties for Deepfakes, but there needs to be more policy solutions for youth offenders.
Please fill out our contact form to get in touch with the Bernard Center.